Dilapidations in Commercial Leases in Ireland: What Landlords and Tenants Need to Know

29th July 2026

Returning the keys does not automatically end a commercial tenant’s property obligations. Damaged finishes, overdue repairs, unremoved partitions, abandoned equipment or missing compliance records can lead to a dilapidations claim after the tenant has left. Landlords face a different risk: if the condition of the premises is reviewed too late, necessary work may delay a sale, extend the vacancy period or prevent the next tenant from moving in on time.

Dilapidations in commercial leases in Ireland are therefore important for both sides of the landlord-and-tenant relationship. The tenant needs to understand what it agreed to repair, maintain, decorate and restore. The landlord must distinguish genuine lease breaches from improvements that would leave the property in a better condition than the lease requires. The correct position depends on the lease, the physical condition of the premises, supporting records and the landlord’s plans for the property.

What Are Dilapidations in a Commercial Lease?

Dilapidations are breaches of a tenant’s lease obligations relating to the condition, repair and handback of commercial premises. They are not limited to visible damage. A claim may also involve overdue decoration, failure to remove an office fit-out, unauthorised alterations, missing maintenance records or failure to return the premises in the condition required by the yield-up clause.

The term is commonly used for lease-end claims, but dilapidations can also arise while the lease is running. A landlord may raise an issue during the term if disrepair is becoming worse or affecting the value, safety or operation of the building. Near lease expiry, the focus usually moves to the work required before the tenant leaves and the financial loss that may result if those obligations are not completed.

When Can Dilapidations Arise?

Dilapidations are most closely associated with lease expiry, but they can affect several stages of a commercial tenancy. The timing matters because the available options and the purpose of the claim may change depending on whether the tenant is still occupying the property or has already left.

During the Commercial Lease

During the lease term, a landlord may become concerned about neglected maintenance, water penetration, damage to building services or alterations completed without approval. The lease may give the landlord inspection rights and may contain procedures for requiring the tenant to address a continuing breach.

An interim schedule of dilapidations can be used to record current problems before the lease ends. Its purpose is often to prevent further deterioration rather than calculate a final lease-end settlement. Any right to enter the premises, complete work or recover the cost must be checked against the lease and legal advice. A landlord should not assume that every remedy is automatically available simply because disrepair exists.

At Lease Expiry or Tenant Exit

At natural lease expiry, the premises are compared with the condition required by the tenant’s repair, decoration, reinstatement and yield-up covenants. The landlord may inspect the property before expiry so the tenant has an opportunity to complete valid work, followed by another inspection after the tenant’s fit-out and belongings have been removed.

The final condition can reveal issues that were previously hidden by furniture, raised floors, suspended ceilings or fixed equipment. Returning possession does not remove liability for valid breaches that existed at the handback date. The parties may agree that the tenant will complete the work, pay an agreed settlement or use a combination of both approaches.

At a Break, Assignment, Surrender or Renewal

Dilapidations can also matter when a tenant exercises a break clause, transfers the lease, negotiates an early surrender or receives a new lease. A break clause may contain conditions involving vacant possession, rent payments or lease compliance. The exact wording must be reviewed because failure to satisfy a break condition can affect whether the lease ends as intended.

On assignment, existing disrepair may need to be addressed between the landlord, outgoing tenant and incoming tenant. A negotiated surrender may include an agreed payment for repair and reinstatement exposure. Where an existing tenancy is being renewed, liability under the old lease should be documented instead of being allowed to pass uncertainly into the new arrangement. Irish legal commentary has highlighted the risk of disputes where old-lease dilapidations are not settled before renewal or assignment. 

Which Documents Decide the Landlord’s and Tenant’s Liability?

A reliable dilapidations assessment begins with the lease documents, not with a contractor’s quotation. The documents define the property, allocate responsibilities and establish the standard in which the premises must be returned.

The Commercial Lease and Demised Premises

The lease should first be checked to identify the demolished premises, meaning the exact area and building elements granted to the tenant. Depending on the drafting, the demise may include internal finishes only, or it may extend to windows, doors, roof structures, external walls, yards, parking areas and mechanical systems.

The repair covenant then determines what the tenant must do. Other clauses may deal separately with decoration, statutory compliance, alterations, inspection rights, insurance and yielding up the property. The notice provisions also matter because formal documents may need to be served at a stated address and by a specified method.

FRI Lease vs Internal Repairing Lease

The distinction between a Full Repairing and Insuring lease and an Internal Repairing Lease can significantly affect a tenant’s exposure. These labels provide a useful starting point, but they do not replace a full review of the wording.

An FRI covenant can require the tenant to place the premises into repair, not simply preserve the condition in which it received them. This may create exposure for defects that existed before occupation unless a schedule of condition or another clause limits the obligation. The lease plan, definitions and exclusions must therefore be considered alongside the repair covenant.

Schedule of Condition

A schedule of condition records the physical state of the property at or near the beginning of the lease. It may contain dated photographs, room-by-room descriptions, marked plans and details of existing defects. Its purpose is often to prevent the tenant from being required to return the premises in a better condition than the recorded starting condition.

The schedule must be properly connected to the lease. A collection of photographs stored separately from the signed documents may offer limited protection if the repair clause does not state how those photographs affect the tenant’s obligation. SCSI guidance explains that a schedule of condition normally modifies or clarifies repairing liability and should contain factual observations supported by photographs and clear lease references.

Alteration Licences and Supporting Documents

A licence for alterations may be as important as the main lease. It can decide whether partitions, cabling, signage, counters, suspended ceilings or specialist equipment must be removed at the end of the term. Some licences require automatic reinstatement, while others allow the landlord to choose whether alterations remain.

The wording may also require the landlord to give advance notice before reinstatement becomes necessary. SCSI guidance states that an obligation to reinstate lawful alterations must arise from an express lease or licence provision and that any required notice must comply with the relevant conditions.

What Must a Commercial Tenant Repair, Remove or Restore?

The scope of the tenant’s work depends on the lease. Dilapidations usually fall into four connected areas: repair, decoration, reinstatement and final handback. Each must be assessed separately because satisfying one obligation does not automatically satisfy the others.

Repair and Property Maintenance

Repairing covenants vary widely. Some require the tenant to keep the premises in good repair, while others require it to put and keep the property in repair. The second form can be broader because the tenant may need to correct an existing defect before it can maintain the required standard.

Typical items may include walls, flooring, ceilings, windows, doors, plumbing, drainage, heating, ventilation, electrical installations, external surfaces and yard areas. Structural and external responsibility depends on whether those elements form part of the demise and whether the lease places them on the tenant or landlord.

Redecoration

Decoration clauses often operate separately from repair clauses. A tenant may have maintained the structure and services but still face a claim because walls, woodwork or external finishes were not decorated at the required time or standard.

The lease may specify decoration intervals, colours, materials and whether the premises must be redecorated shortly before expiry. Surface preparation is also relevant. Applying fresh paint over damaged or poorly prepared finishes may not satisfy the covenant.

Tenant Alterations and Reinstatement

Commercial tenants often change premises to suit their operations. Office occupiers may install partitions, meeting rooms, raised floors and data cabling. Retail tenants may add counters, signage and display systems. Industrial tenants may install racking, equipment bases, security systems or additional power supplies.

At the end of the lease, the tenant may be required to remove some or all of these works and restore the original layout. This can include making good holes, repairing floor finishes, removing signs and returning mechanical or electrical systems to their previous arrangement.

The landlord’s future plans matter. Existing partitions or cabling may be useful to the next occupier, while specialist equipment may reduce marketability. The landlord should give clear written instructions where the lease gives it a choice between retaining and removing alterations.

Statutory Compliance and Final Handback

A commercial lease may allocate responsibility for planning conditions, building regulations, fire safety, accessibility, environmental requirements and statutory notices. Liability depends on the wording and on whether the issue resulted from the tenant’s use, fit-out or failure to maintain equipment.

The yield-up covenant brings the handback requirements together. It may require vacant possession, cleaning, removal of stock and waste, return of keys, repair of damage, reinstatement, decoration and delivery of certificates or operating manuals. SCSI guidance notes that the yield-up clause may impose its own standard and therefore needs separate review near the end of the lease.

What Is a Schedule of Dilapidations?

A schedule of dilapidations is an itemised document that identifies alleged lease breaches, links them to relevant clauses and states the remedial work required. Where a financial claim is expected, it may also include estimated costs and related professional fees.

The schedule should be prepared after reviewing the lease and inspecting the property. It should not contain every cosmetic issue automatically. Each item should be supported by a contractual obligation and a proportionate remedy.

Interim, Terminal and Final Schedules

Different schedules may be used depending on the stage of the lease. The terminology is not always used in exactly the same way by every adviser. What matters is the timing, purpose and condition of the property when the document is prepared. A final inspection can be particularly important after the tenant removes its fit-out. Hidden floor damage, wall openings or service defects may only become visible at that stage.

SCSI’s recommended format includes the item number, clause number, breach, remedial work and landlord’s costing. It also recommends sufficiently detailed pricing where the amount may be challenged.

Who Prepares and Reviews the Schedule?

A chartered building surveyor normally inspects the premises and prepares or responds to the technical schedule. A commercial property solicitor interprets the lease, advises on notices and assesses the legal basis of the claim. A valuation surveyor may be needed where diminution in the landlord’s interest is disputed, while a quantity surveyor or contractor may assist with detailed pricing.

SCSI recommends initial independent inspections for the parties and usually at least one later joint inspection as part of the negotiation process.

How Is a Dilapidations Claim Valued?

The total shown in a schedule is not automatically the amount payable by the tenant. A claim must be tested against the lease, reasonable remedial work, supporting prices, the landlord’s actual loss and any statutory limits.

Cost of the Remedial Works

The starting point is often the reasonable cost of completing valid repairs, decoration and reinstatement. The calculation may include contractor work, access equipment, cleaning, project administration and professional input.

Prices should be itemised. This allows the tenant’s advisers to identify whether the scope is valid, whether the proposed method is proportionate and whether the rates are reasonable. For a substantial claim, detailed contractor quotations or quantity-surveying input may be needed.

Section 65 and Diminution in Value

Section 65 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1980 is a central Irish provision for damages arising from breach of repairing covenants. It states that court-awarded damages cannot exceed the amount by which the value of the landlord’s reversion has been reduced because of the breach. The landlord’s reversion is its interest in receiving the property back. 

In practical terms, a valuation may compare the landlord’s interest if the repairing obligation had been satisfied with its value in the condition actually returned. The difference attributable to the breach may cap the recoverable damages.

Section 65 also restricts court recovery in stated circumstances where repair is physically impossible, excessively costly in relation to the property’s value or commercially pointless without substantial reconstruction. The Act contains an exception where the lack of repair is caused wholly or substantially by wilful damage or waste. 

Betterment and Supersession

Betterment arises where the landlord seeks work that would leave the property in a better state than the tenant was required to provide. An example would be demanding a premium replacement finish where a normal commercial repair would satisfy the covenant.

Supersession may arise where the claimed work has lost its practical value because the landlord plans to replace, alter or demolish the relevant part. Repairing a ceiling may make little commercial sense if the ceiling will be removed during an immediate refurbishment. Reinstating an office layout may also be unnecessary where the next occupier wants to retain the existing partitions.

These issues do not automatically defeat a claim, but they affect the assessment of reasonable loss. The landlord’s re-letting, refurbishment or redevelopment plan should therefore be established before the final financial position is agreed.

Loss of Rent and Professional Fees

A landlord may also seek losses connected with the time reasonably required to complete valid works. Claimed items can include lost rent, commercial rates, insurance, security, utilities or service-charge shortfalls. Professional fees may involve building surveyors, solicitors, valuers, quantity surveyors or project managers.

These amounts are not automatically recoverable. The landlord should show the contractual basis, connection with the tenant’s breach, reasonable duration and supporting evidence. SCSI guidance notes that fee recovery may depend on an express lease provision, consequential-loss principles, settlement terms or litigation costs.

How Does the Dilapidations Claim Process Work?

A structured process helps the parties separate genuine lease breaches from disputed or commercially unnecessary work. Early engagement also gives the tenant more opportunity to complete valid work before losing control of the premises.

  • Landlord decides whether to re-let, sell, refurbish or redevelop
  • Lease, plans, licences and condition records are reviewed
  • Building surveyor inspects and records the premises
  • Schedule of dilapidations is prepared and served correctly
  • Tenant’s solicitor and surveyor review liability and costs
  • Surveyors compare positions and reinspect disputed items
  • Parties agree works, a settlement or a combination
  • Completed work is inspected and remaining issues are documented
  • Unresolved matters may proceed to mediation, arbitration or court
  • The landlord’s intended property outcome should be considered first. Requiring a full strip-out may be commercially unhelpful if the next tenant wants fitted space. In contrast, retaining a highly specialised fit-out may restrict re-letting.

The tenant should respond item by item. A Scott Schedule is often used to place the landlord’s allegation, proposed remedy and cost beside the tenant’s response, alternative work and valuation. SCSI provides recommended Scott Schedule formats to support this detailed negotiation.

How Can Landlords and Tenants Reduce Dilapidations Risk?

Dilapidations risk is easier to control when the parties maintain reliable records and address property condition before the final weeks of the tenancy. Waiting until the tenant has arranged its move can limit the time available for inspections, quotations, landlord approvals and contractor work.

Practical Steps for Landlords

A landlord should retain the signed lease, plans, alteration licences, side letters and condition records throughout the tenancy. Serious disrepair should be addressed while it is still manageable. Before expiry, the landlord should decide whether the property will be re-let in its current configuration, refurbished, sold or redeveloped.

That decision should guide the surveyor’s instructions. It can prevent money being claimed for work that will immediately be removed. The landlord should also provide reinstatement instructions with enough time for the tenant to complete them and should support the final costs with clear evidence.

Practical Steps for Tenants

A tenant should review the lease before planning its move, locate the original schedule of condition and gather all fit-out approvals. A tenant-side assessment can identify likely exposure before a formal claim arrives and can help the business set a realistic budget.

The tenant should ask the landlord which alterations must remain and which must be removed. Approved work should be documented with photographs, invoices, certificates and maintenance records. A final joint inspection can reduce later disagreement about whether the premises were returned in the agreed condition.

How REA Sothern Can Help With the Next Commercial Property Decision

Once the lease and technical issues have been reviewed, the property owner must decide what happens next. The premises may be re-let, sold with vacant possession, marketed with an existing tenant or improved before being brought back to the market.

REA Sothern provides commercial sales and rental services and states that its commercial property coverage includes Carlow, Kildare, Laois and Kilkenny. Its role is commercially distinct from that of the building surveyor and solicitor: the surveyor assesses the condition and technical work, the solicitor advises on lease liability, and the commercial agent advises on market positioning and occupier demand. REA Sothern can help a landlord assess current occupier demand, competing availability, achievable rent and the likely vacancy period. This can help determine whether existing fit-out should be retained, whether selected improvements may improve market appeal and whether the whole property or smaller areas should be offered.

REA Sothern can also assist with enquiries, viewings, rental discussions and heads of terms. The technical scope of repairs remains a building-surveying matter, while contractual liability should remain with the parties’ legal advisers.